The Bray of Fundie 1:44 said... "Did I write anything offensive?"
No not really except the misleading headline "On the Chasidification of the Rest of Jewry- A Ya"T Kislev Rumination " It should of read כ"א כסלו what did 19 kislov had to do with any of the issues mentioned (except the debatable kiruv issue.. ) btw you left out kashrus! The #1 important change in America post WWII
Another result of the Iruv Parshiyos is that more people universally look for and say over a Vort, particularly a short Vort, on the Vokh'idige Parsha. This has Khasidishe Up'Shtam , I feel.
good analysis, 1 minor nitpick.
ReplyDeleteLe'Shitos'kho, it should be spelled Khasidification
If you wanna go the Yiddisht/academic route, then go for it fully.
Az Men Est Khazer, Zoll Rinn'en Fin Boord
modern anti-zionist has nothing to do with chassidim, it has to do with litvishe and hungarian kanaus.
ReplyDeleteThe Bray of Fundie 1:44 said...
ReplyDelete"Did I write anything offensive?"
No not really except the misleading headline "On the Chasidification of the Rest of Jewry- A Ya"T Kislev Rumination "
It should of read כ"א כסלו what did 19 kislov had to do with any of the issues mentioned (except the debatable kiruv issue.. ) btw you left out kashrus! The #1 important change in America post WWII
ROTFLMHO
ReplyDeleteHeadlines are meant to be familiar abd attract readers to a spelling that they are comfortable with.
In the articles themselves I do my Q and kh hock
Another result of the Iruv Parshiyos is that more people universally look for and say over a Vort, particularly a short Vort, on the Vokh'idige Parsha.
ReplyDeleteThis has Khasidishe Up'Shtam , I feel.
I've addressed many of the criticisms in a new post. Check it out:
ReplyDeletehttp://innate-differences.blogspot.com/2011/12/defending-chasidification.html