This may be one of the reasons why Facebook was created. Our good friend Dovid Zaklikowski has created a beautiful Facebook page/group where he features many never-before-seen pictures of happenings in the Lubavitcher הויף and other happenings within .כרם חב"ד These pictures are usually without captions, save for sometimes giving a general caption or idea that tells you the general date or time or place of the event. Visitors are then asked to identify the individuals in the pictures. Take for example this picture here, of the revered Chossid Reb Shmiel Duvid Raichik ע"ה of California; where else would you see such a picture? Nowhere. And where else would you have such a Chossid? only in Lubavitch. Elsewhere he'd be a Rebbe already.
l-r: Rav Shlomo Wolbe, Rav Yakov Yisroel הי"ד, Rav Mordechai Schulman of Slabodka.
איי, וועט איר דאך פרעגן, what's the Lubavitch angle in this picture? Are we now claiming Rav Wolbe, or perhaps the Slabodka Bnei Beraq Rosh Yeshiva as one of our own? No, silly, it's Rav Zuber that made this picture appear in the archives. He was a Lubavitcher Chossid. The picture is apparently from the time that RYYZ was Rov in Stockholm, or maybe not. Rav Wolbe was from Sweden, but we don't know if RMS was ever in Sweden. So maybe it's from a time that RYYZ traveled to Europe. There are pictures of him with Reb Lazer Yudel Finkel in the archive as well. He later immigrated to the United States and was killed by a drunk sheigetz around New Year's of 1953. See an interview with his daughter Mrs. Chana Sharfstein from Crown Heights in Mishpacha magazine.
And here we have a wonderful picture of the Chossid Reb Bentche Shemtov at a family simcha. Those who know could tell you that at a certain point of the simcha/farbrengen Reb Bentche would get up and make himself heard. Here he was probably calling out some other chossid, telling him that he's a no-good bum, for one reason or another. That he wasn't mekusher to the Rebbe and is therefore not worthy of breathing the air on G-d's green earth. To his left was his brother-in-law, the unforgettable Reb Mendel Futerfas.
actually bentche shemtov was married to mendel futerfas's sister, mendel futerfas was married to rubinson.
ReplyDeleteand Serebrianski was also married to a Futerfas?
ReplyDeleteyes
ReplyDeleteR shmuel dovid raichik, wasn't shmeel since otvotzk when the amshinover sent him to tomchei tmimim.
ReplyDeletehe was and STILL is!
ReplyDeleteNot by anyone besides berel weiss a"h.
ReplyDeleteTzig quote: "And where else would you have such a Chossid? only in Lubavitch. Elsewhere he'd be a Rebbe already."
ReplyDeleteניבּא ואינו יודע מה ניבּא! ווען דער לעצטער ליבּאוויטשר רבּי איז געקומען מנח"א זיין דעם סאטמאר רבּין ז"ל על פּטירות בּתו, האט דער סאטמאר רבּי גירעדט אַמערסטנ'ס מיט'ן חסיד וואס איז מיט געקימ'ן מיטן ליבּאוויטשר רבּין, דערנאך האט אימער גיפרעגט דעם סאטמאר רבּין היתכן? האט ער גיענטפערט: דער חסיד גיפעלט מיר בּעסער וויא דער רבּי
ouch!
א פריש-געבאקענער ליגענט
ReplyDeleteHirshel Tzig - הירשל ציג said...
ReplyDeleteא פריש-געבאקענער ליגענט
.זאל זיין וויא די ווילסט
." And where else would you have such a Chossid? only in Lubavitch. Elsewhere he'd be a Rebbe already."
ReplyDeleteJust a silly comment.
There are and were many chasidim of other rebbes who remained chasidim though they were rebbe caliber.
Why do you say silly things, when your point could be just as well taken without adding narunes.
Very nice pics,but PLEASE, can someone caption them? Without names it loses so much value
ReplyDeleteshea. the captions are in the post. he middle one even has captions after the pic.
ReplyDeleteא פריש-געבאקענער ליגענט
ReplyDeleteWhy?
R'Yoel could not have said it?
And since R'Reichik came from a more Poylishe chasidic backround he had much more in common with R'Yoel
Hirshel,
ReplyDeleteI mean on the Lubavitch archives facebook page.I don't see captions
1) it wasn't R Raichik, it was R' Shmuel Levitin
ReplyDelete2) You really think that a Chossid would allow another Rebbe/Rov to address him while the Rebbe is ignored?! The story is SUPPOSEDLY based on the fact that RYT THOUGHT at the beginning of the visit that Reb Shmuel Levitin was the Rebbe. He was immediately told of his MISTAKE. And that story grew a beard and you're stroking that beard now...
some he knows and some he wants the readers to write captions for. To get them to participate.
ReplyDeleteHirshel: "RYT THOUGHT at the beginning of the visit that Reb Shmuel Levitin was the Rebbe. He was immediately told of his MISTAKE. And that story grew a beard and you're stroking that beard now..."
ReplyDeleteRight Hirshel!, but both is true.
how can both be true?
ReplyDeleteHirshel Tzig - הירשל ציג said: "how can both be true?"
ReplyDeleteWhen they came in Reb Shmuel Levitin or whoever was with him, was more of a rebeshe look and SR took him for the rebbe!, than when they left, he was asked on that, why he supposedly ignored the LR? that's when he found out that he mistakenly took the gabi for the rebbe! so SR quipt דער חסיד גיפעלט מיר בּעסער וויא דער רבּי
ouch, ki hodom yireh l'aynayim v'hashem yireh lalavov
ReplyDeleteignored? they had a whole long conversation!
ReplyDeleteouch, but if ryt was a true tzaddik, he would never say such a thing to another Jew, he would maybe think it. is Shma minoh.....
ReplyDeletehttp://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/s720x720/301813_10150735259327581_603712580_9784183_856556979_n.jpg
ReplyDeleteignored? they had a whole long conversation!
ReplyDeletetranscrits anywhre?
Ouch
ReplyDelete".זאל זיין וויא די ווילסט"
I guess that you admit you love the lie better if it seves the hate machine....
Hirshel Tzig
ReplyDeleteyou are correct that both shmussen are known and printed....
megaleh said...
ReplyDeleteouch, ki hodom yireh l'aynayim v'hashem yireh lalavov
גמרא ברכות דף ז
תניא, אמר רבי ישמעאל בן אלישע: פעם אחת נכנסתי להקטיר קטורת לפני ולפנים, וראיתי אכתריאל יה ה' צבאות שהוא יושב על כסא רם ונשא...
רבי צדוק הכהן מלובלין מעלה האם האיש לבוש הבדים, שהוא אכתריאל, הוא שמו של הקב"ה בעצמו, או שם של מלאך
ומוצא סימוכין במקומות.. שהכוונה למלאך וזה המלאך נראה לר' ישמעאל כהן גדול בקדשי קדשים בדמות מלאך. ע"כ
והרבּי מ"מ מילאבּאוויטש לא הי' לו הלבוש הבדים! האיצטלא דרבּנן ובּקל אוכל לטעות בּו
Anonymous said... Ouch
ReplyDelete".זאל זיין וויא די ווילסט"
..אין בּהכחשתו 'בהמעשׂה' שום פּגיעה
אולי מפּני דרכי שלום, הודה לו בּטענות
די דריי שוואגערס – ר' זלמן, ר' ב''צ, און ר' מענדל – האבן ערשט געהאט זייערע יארצייטען בסימוכין זל''ז: : אויף ג', ד', און ה' תמוז.
ReplyDelete–– זא''י
,נ.ב: בענין ביקור הליובאוויטשער רבי אצל הסאטמער רבי בשנת תשי''ב – הנה לפני הרבה שנים שמעתי מהרה''ת ר' ש''ב אלפעראוויץ שהי' אז בחור והי' שם בפרטי הדברים והוא לא הזכיר הפרט אודות ’'דער חסיד געפעלט מיר כו''' – אבל לא ראינו אינו ראי'...
רש''ב הנ''ל כן הוסיף, שקרוב לסוף הביקור נכנס א' מגדולי המתנגדים (כמדומה שהי' הג' הר''א קאטלער) בעת שהשני אדמו''רים היו מדברים בעניני דנסתר התורה (קבלה, חסי'), ובעת שישב הג' הנ''ל, הפנה אליו הסאטמער רבי וא''ל: ''דאס איז נישט פאר אייך...’'
רש''ב הנ''ל כן אישר שבעת שנכנסו בדירת הסאטמער רבי, הפנה הסאטמערער אל הר' שמואל בקריאת ’'ליובאוויטשער רבי'', ומיד הראה ר''ש על הרבי (הרמ''ש) שהוא הרבי – וע''ז הגיב הסאטמערער: ''אה, א (פיינער?) יונגערמאן'' – או משהוא כזה (אינו בדיוק ויש לברר אצל רש''ב הנ''ל
ReplyDelete(
–– זא''י
ziy
ReplyDeleteכמדומני אז דו פארמישט די יוצרות
:ציג
ReplyDelete?(היינו תשי''ב עם ביקור אחר (תשכ''ה
יש לברר ג''כ עם ר' לייבל גראנער שהי' ג''כ שם
ר' ש''ב הנ''ל האט גוט געשמאק מתאר געווען ווי ס'האט אויסגעקוקט בעת דער ליובאוויטשער רבי איז געגאנגען צופוס אויף די וויליאמסבורגער געסער, ואיך הסאטמער רבי, אחר שהכיר שהרמ''ש הינו הליובאוויטשער רבי, מיד כיבדו כדקא יאות
...
–– זא''י
ניין
ReplyDeleteבתשכ"ה כבר לא הי' הרא"ק בין החיים, אז זה צריך להיות בביקור הראשון, אבל זה הי' בתשי"ד, לא בתשי"ב, בעת פטירת בתו היחידה רויזע'לע
the 5714 shmus is printed in menachem meishiv nafshi. The SR asked if halloween is a yoim aidom or stam a "kinder shpil". The Rebbe answered that l'chioirah its yoim aidom. This occurred during cheshvan, so it was dovor b'itoi.
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting the picture of my father. When he moved to LA, moishe weiss (berel's brother) wanted to set him up in a shul and he would be the gabbai. the plan was to get a rabistive going. My father refused to do it, and said he is a chossid of the Rebbe and wil always be one. I heard this from R' Moishe directly.
After the war, most of the survivor community in LA had zero interest in their old chassidishe hoifs. My father strongly encouraged them to reconnect to their roots, including pushing MW to travel to the SR. So he had a hand in MW becoming of of satmar's biggest supporters.
One more thing:
ReplyDeleteHis nickname varied by the person. I heard Reb Shmuel Dovid, Rabbi Raichik, Shmeel Duvid. The Rebbe referred to him as Harav Raichik.
There's a picture of R' ShDR during the war (in Vilna) posing with R' AY Garfinkel & 2 other temimim. R' ShD is wearing a grey fedora & a tie. In pictures of him later, he wears only a black hat & no tie. When did this change?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.chabad.info/index.php/images/images/body_bg1.gif?url=article_he&id=66340
-- ZIY
i never heard anyone who was less that 20 years younger than rabbi raichik refer to him as anything else.
ReplyDeleteyankee, treat us to a guest post about growing up in LA
ReplyDeleteYou don't need a Facebook account to browse this beautiful treasure.
ReplyDeleteYankee did you never here RMF (on their trips together) call him rabbi raachik... With his pikchusdikeh twinkle in his eye. Rabbi raachik...ihr zeit shem greit zu machen kiddesh... Ah what those two were...
ReplyDelete4. Mrs. Leah Edelman wrote:
ReplyDeletethe picture of Rabbi Jacob Yisrael Zuber. who was my father was taken in Sweden in the summer of the early 40's to be exact this happened in Skarppy,our summer home in the arcepelagos. Rabbi Wolbe was definitly not on the Chassidshe side, however, Rabbi Schulman was a great man
Nitpicker,
ReplyDeletemy father's relationship with RMF was a hafla upelah & their only connection was total bittul to the Rebbe. their personalities, character, expressions, were so different, yet the mutual respect and admiration they showed each other was mind-blowing. I remember my father once sitting by RMF in a farbrengen. RMF took some mashke and started doing a zalman moishe on someone with some choice language thrown in, v'hameivin yovin. my father sat there without saying a word and listened like a 15 yo bochur. once i was driving them around & RMF asked my father to chazer a maamor. he declined, so RMF said nu a sicha. my father said u should. this went back and forth until they agreed that the right thing to do during a car ride is say the 12 psukim together.
there's alot more to this, the bottom line is total bittul can connect people that are total opposites.
Reb Yankel
ReplyDeleteThanks for the 12 pesukim story...You made my day
Why am I turned off by the "total bittul" ?
ReplyDeleteWhat makes adults suddenly stop thinking?
Also what does the story about Futerfas and the 12 pesukim show??
I dunno, this type of Lubavitcher nonsense is a major turn off.
One of the reasons that Lubavitch has a very powerful meshichist nut job group is because of "the total bittul" and nobody questioning.
Cultish
David
ReplyDeleteIf u really want ro understand th concept of bitul read elie weisels court testimony during the sefarim trial.
If you're stam haking, KIT
Yankee,
ReplyDeleteSorry for coming across as being negative.But I do want to understand what it's about.
I heard from people that your father was a gem, beloved by everybody and widely respected
While I"m at it I have to say I added the blog to my blogroll.Interesting and passionate discussions and real.
ReplyDeleteSometimes folks get nasty but that's the way it is in the real world.
One last request from bal hablog.
ReplyDeleteI see you have an artistic eye for pictures.Please keep them coming!
And some more links like this picture archive.
ok, david. since you asked so nicely.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward
ReplyDelete"If you're stam haking, KIT"
ReplyDeleteYankee,
I"m sure you never heard your father talk like this...
Umesaymim betov
When the tree is on top of the hill, the apple rolls very far
DeleteDavid
ReplyDelete"One of the reasons that Lubavitch has a very powerful meshichist nut job group is because of "the total bittul" and nobody questioning.
Cultish"
Does not chabad have a big anti chabad segment that are arguing for years with the other camp....where do you come up with your facts....
Did I say Chabad does not have a big anti segment?
ReplyDeleteAll I said was that there is a powerful Meshichist movement and gave what I thought the reason may be.
You must admit that the Meshichist movement is a very strange phenomenon and not going away anytime soon
yankee! your tree on the top of the hill analogy was very touching.
ReplyDeleteAre you sure that's R'M" Shulman. I showed the picture to an einekle and he said NO WAY.
ReplyDelete