Monday, January 30, 2006

Of Bans, Earthquakes and Tsunamis



Rabbi N Kamenecki at YU

From an e-mail I received through Baalbatish

15 comments:

Y.W. Editor said...

tzig?
who's his dad?

Hirshel Tzig - הירשל ציג said...

you, Mr. Yeshivishe guy, doesn't know?

איך נפלו הגבורים

Y.W. Editor said...

sammy kaminetzky from philly yeshiva?
or his father R' yackov ZATZAL?

Anonymous said...

Isn't he the auther of "MOAG"?

Hirshel Tzig - הירשל ציג said...

Sammy?! oy vey!

it does say "N" Kamenecki.

he is the author, zezmir.

Anonymous said...

this post is akin to coming into a restaurant to eat, and being told that the steak i ordered is still running around in the field outside with the understanding that i have to go catch, shecht, and cook it.

Anonymous said...

Tzig I got no patience to hear the whole drosha, can you please give a "בקיצור"?

Hirshel Tzig - הירשל ציג said...

friends;

posts like these happen from time to tim either because of lack of time or lack of material to post.

Anonymous said...

A YW editor refers to a choshuve RY like that ? What's going on here????

baalbatish said...

Mr. Tzig,
It would be nice if you would attribute the links that you have on your blog.
On my blog the Kamenetzky Link went up on January 25 and the Yated editor link on January 29th at 2:53 AM
You have a great blog keep up the good work.

Hirshel Tzig - הירשל ציג said...

baalbatish

I received it as an e-mail without a source. If you wish you can post the link here and I'll post it to the thread.

baalbatish said...

Thanks. I hope I am doing this correctly.

http://baalbatish.blogspot.com/2006/01/lecture-by-rabbi-nathan-kamenetzky-at.html

Anonymous said...

Yesh L'Hoer that RNK is the son-in-law of the Suvalker Rov, HaRav Dovid Lifshitz, who was the Rosh Yeshiva in RIETS for many years, so maybe RYK would not object.

Hirshel Tzig - הירשל ציג said...

Synopsis to follow shortly, iy"h. Some pretty heady stuff said at the shiur.

Anonymous said...

I just listened to the shiur.
It was interesting to be sure. There were a number of things I agree with him on, but his logic in explaining why the Tzunami (for example) is not a message for Klal Yisroel is unbelievably poor.