Pic of the Day

(At the wedding of Reb Nachman Yosef Twersky, son of Reb Yisroel Mordche of Rachmistrivke, and grandson of Reb Yochantshe, to the daughter of the recently deceased Reb Moshe Ashkenazy of Tel Aviv. R-L Reb Moshe, the Chosson, RYMT of R'strivke, and YBLCH"t his brother, Reb Itzikel Twersky of Boro Park.)

I imagine there were some uncomfortable moments at the wedding.

Also visible are Reb Hirshel Chitrik, a nephew(?) of Reb Moshe, and another of Reb Yochantshe's sons behind the Chosson. (Avrohom Dov? Velvel? Yeshoshua Heshel?)

Photo by Shturem

All Yidden are Shayech to Nesi Doreinu

One of the pet peeves of the non-Lubavitcher community is that Lubavitchers somehow feel that there are 2 groups of Yidden: Lubavitchers, and those who are "not yet Lubavitchers." This sense of entitlement or prestige (maybe there's a better term for it) ticks off most "Fremde" because it tells them that their heritage is looked down upon and that Lubavitchers think they should change it. Obviously that's an exxaggeration, nobody expects all Yidden to begin learning Chassidus, although that may be the ultimate goal. Yet here's something that may get your goat a just a bit. There may be some truth to that notion after all.

A blogger friend of mine showed me that in the Farbrengen of Shavuos 5713 the Rebbe spoke about the idea that the Choson should Chazzer a Maamar Chassidus at his Kabolas Ponim just like the FR did at the Rebbe's wedding, and since we follow in his ways we too should Chazzer a Maamer. He mentioned the fact that the Maamar that the previous Rebbe said at the Rebbe's Chasuna - beginnning with Lecho Dodi - is an appropriate choice since it mentions all the names of the Rabbeyim and it was said as an "invitation" to the Neshomos of the Rabbeyim. (Since Tzaddikim place themselves into their Torah, reciting their Torah works as an invitation to the authors of that Torah.) Although there may be others that fit that criteria what better choice is there than to say the same Maamar that the Frierdige Rebbe said. The Rebbe went on to say that this applies to all weddings, that all weddings "Zol men Chazzeren di Maamer Lecho Dodi" not just to those of Lubavitcher Talmidim, since it's an inyan that concerns all Jews. The Rebbe went on to say that if there are "Oylimishe Yidden" here he hopes that they won't be Makpid on what he's about to say, but even if they will he still needs to say it "like it is."

כל בני ישראל, יהיו מי שיהיו, המשכת חיותם היא ע"י הנשיאים,כמבואר בתניא ש"יניקת וחיות נפש רוח ונשמה של עמי הארץ הוא מנפש רוח ונשמה של הצדיקים והחכמים ראשי בני ישראל שבדורם", כשם ש"יניקת הצפרנים וחיותם נמשכת מהמוח שבראש", ועד שאפילו אלה שמנגדים כו', מקבלים גם הם חיותם ע"י הנשיאים. – האמת היא שגם אלה שמנגדים כו', הנה התנגדותם גופא מוכיחה שבאמת אוחזים הם מהרביים, כי, אילו לא היו אוחזים מהם, לא היו מנגדים אליהם, אלא כיון שגם הם אוחזים מהרביים, וחוששים שמא יתקרבו על ידם לתורה ולחסידות כו' – ודבר זה הוא בניגוד לרצונם – לכן הם מנגדים כו', אבל בפנימיות לבבם אוחזים גם הם מהרביים. ובפרט ע"פ הידוע שאדמו"ר הזקן רצה שתורת החסידות תהי' שייכת לא רק לאיזה מפלגה כו', אלא לכלל ישראל,– פעם הציע לי מישהו להוציא לאור ענין חדש שיהי' מתאים עבור כל בני ישראל. ועניתי לו – בפשיטות – שתורת החסידות היא עבור כל בני ישראל –וכיון שבודאי יתמלא רצונו ("ער וועט דאָך געוויס אויספירן") שסו"ס יהיו כל בני ישראל חסידים, שהרי "רצון יראיו יעשה" – הרי כל האמור לעיל שייך לכל בני ישראל.

Free translation:

All Yidden get their Chayus through the leaders of the generation, just as the fingernails get their Chayus from the Moach. Even those that may oppose him, and they oppose him only because their afraid of being drawn to Toras HaChassidus which they don't want to happen, they too "hold" of the Rabbeyim, and they too get their Chayus from the Nosi HaDor. Therefore, and since the Alter Rebbe wanted Chassidus not for a single "party" but for Klal Yisroel, then the recitation of the Maamer is something that concerns all Jews. This was discussed at a recent wedding where the father was a Lubavitcher Chossid and the Chosson was not (yet.) A Mashpiah at the wedding went on to recite the Maamer, when in attendance were some "Choshuve" Yidden who are not knows for their love to Lubavitch. When he was asked why pointed to this Sichah, saying that the Maamer is Shayech to all Jews.

See the Sichah beginning from Number 218, Courtesy of ChabadLibrary.org

Back from Overseas

I was away Thursday night till today. A nice 3 day disconnect. Shluchim are amazing people, they're regular miracle-workers. We'll get this thing going again shortly, Iy"h. I need to catch up and respond to some comments posted here.

Bubbe Maryasha o"h

(Maryasha Garelick, at right, with her mother and brother, circa 1917. Photo: Wellsprings)

With great sorrow we report the passing of Mrs. Maryasha Garelik-Shagalov, a"h of Crown Heights, wife of Reb Elchanan, הי"ד, who was killed at a young age in Soviet Russia. Mrs. Maryasha lived to the ripe old age of 106. She was dedicated to 'Oholei Torah' for which she collected money devotedly on a voluntary basis. She would stand for hours on Sundays to raise money for this purpose, collecting from the people who stood on line for dollars from the Rebbe. Rebbetzin Maryasha, part of the scene of 770, was survived by a blessed family and several generations of descendents, many of whom serve as shluchim around the globe.

(COL)

Another link to the glorious past has been lost. - HT

UPDATE 1/17/07:

An article about her published in '95

Reb Nosson Vogel o"h

Londoner Yiddentum, and the Jewish community the world over lost one of its true treasures last week with the passing of Mr. Nosson Vogel. Hundreds, and perhaps thousands of people packed the funeral chapel and surrounding areas to hear Hespedim by HaRav Yitzchok Meir Hertz, Rov and Rosh Yeshivah of Lubavitch in Golders Green and Hampstead Garden Suburb, and Rav Chaim Halperin, son of Harav Chune Halperin Rov of Golders Green, and one of the Rabbonim in Golders Green. I apologize if the above lines sound like they were lifted from the HaModia or Yated, that wasn't my intention. I don't plan on doing a carbon-copy obituary, but rather a recounting of how I knew him and was influenced by him.

My connection to Reb Nosson began when he was still in good health years ago in London. The warmth he radiated to a total stranger is not something most people do to their own children, let alone otheers. It was the first night of Selichos and Reb Nosson davened for the Amud as he usually would, and like everyhing he did there was a lesson to be learned from the way he davened. Rarely do you see a Yid, not a Rov or Klei Kodesh, but a BaaleBos, daven with such awe, and with such a broken heart, like a child speaks to his father. At times when Simchah was needed the joy on Reb Nosson's face could light up a room. What that taught me was that everything he did was for real, the Ahavas Yisroel was real, the Tzedokoh was real, and the connection to G-d was real.

Reb Nosson was a Yekkishe Yid, born and raised in Germany, and remained that way his whole life. He retained the qualities of being precise, accurate, and fastidious about everything Jewish and Mentshlich, but added the qualities of Hiskashrus to the Rebbe, and the Chassidisher Ahavas Yisroel. He was a tremendous Baal Tzedokoh who gave because he felt the pain of the Yid or the Askon who came to him, and wished to alleviate it. He lead a Torah'dige life in Business too, teaching the unaffiliated Jews who worked at his office about the heritage they lost. His connection to the Rebbe was unwavering, even in a sometimes hostile environment like London, and he wore it proudly. There's much more to be said, especially as far as his connection to Lubavitch, the Rebbe, and the Rebbe's Mosdos, but we'll leave that for another time. Maybe you Londoners could give me a hand too.

More from Crown Heights.info

The leaders of world (Torah) Jewry

(a meeting of the MGH, when they actually WERE something!)

During a late supper this week last week's weekend English HaModia caught my attention. They were still discussing the proposed ban on El Al and a meeting of the American MGH of the AI that was to decide on joining their Israeli counterparts in signing the ban. Now before you jump all over me for going after the Gedolim I would ask you to hear me out, and see that this is not just another Agudah-bashing session, but an objective look at the issue of who's running American Yiddishkeit these days. I also don't plan on bringing Lubavitch into this discussion, believe it or not, since it's totally irrelevant to what we're about to discuss.

The article stated (IIRC, I'm doing this from memory) that present at the meeting in Yeshivas Rabbeinu Chaim Berlin were the following Rabbonim:

Reb Aron Schechter (R"Y Chaim Berlin)
Reb Avrohom Chaim Levin (R"Y Telshe-Chicago)
Reb Shmuel Kamenecki (R"Y Philadelphia)
Reb Simcha Bunim Ehrenfeld (of Mattersdorf)
Reb Yaakov Perlow (of Novominsk)

Amongst the Choshu've Askonim of course.

I look at the list and wonder to myself:

1) Is Torah Jewry completely made up of Yeshivishe and "Litvish/Modern" Jews? Are these the only Jews that need to be represented? Is no Chassidishe Rov suitable to sit on that esteemed dais? Sorry people, the Mattersdorfer Rov doesn't count as Chassidish, and he represents almost nobody these days. In Eretz Yisroel Ger plays a vital if not overbearing role in all things Agudah, why not in the USA? I know that all Hungarian Rabbonim are closely tied with Satmar and won't risk joining, but what about non-Hungarians like Bobov, Vizhnitz (Bnei Brak) and others, why aren't they asked to join? And where are the real Litvishe Gedolim, why aren't they on the council of sages, I mean Yidden like Reb Shmuel Berenbaum, of course, Yidden that saw and shepped from the pre-war greats.

2) Are we to really believe that American Yankees like Levin, Schechter, and Kamenecki, Talmidei Chachomim that they may be, understand enough about Israeli politics to issue a ban against traveling on an airline? I'd be shocked if any of them spoke more than a Bais Yaakov Hebrew, and could understand the intricate details involved in dealing with politicians, especially Israeli ones. Why then would they Bichlal touch the issue, just to show the world?

Oh, what I'd give to be a fly on the wall at one of these meetings, it would be a sight to behold. You'd figure that the Einei Ho'eidoh in America would have a litte self-respect, but I guess not.

More on Ashley X

(Ashley three years ago before treatment began - From her parents' website)

I did a lot of soul searching over Shabbos regarding the parents of Ashley X and what they did to her. I spoke to the father of a child with physical disabilities and he did enlighten me much as to how difficult it is to raise such a child. He of course saw it from his perspective, that of a loving, devoted father full of Bitochon in Hashem. If I was convinced that Ashley's parents were of that persuasion then I'd tend to trust their decision. From statements like "we're college-educated professionals" I feel like they're implying that their decision should not be questioned based on the fact that they're a couple of smart people, the fact that their degrees may be in law or accounting notwithstanding. They forget however that this is not a question of intelligence or lack thereof, but a question of moral right and wrong.

My friend tells me that a hysterectomy he can understand, after all, why should a helpless child have to go through the pains of adulthood. I'm not sure that the Torah allows it, even if it seems to be the "compassionate" thing to do, so I can only say that according to my Daas Baalei Batim maybe that procedure would be acceptable. But that was only a small part of what they did to the child. They basically pumped her up with hormones, and will continue to do so for a long time (again, with little medical knowledge I do not know for how long) just so she'll be less of a burden. I cannot imagine that having anything less than a negative affect on her, and will possibly shorten her life as well. He also tried to compare stunting growth to trying to "stretch" a very short child by percribing human growth hormones, but it's fair to say that corrective or "positive" surgery cannot be compared to stunting growth.

I may have been wrong about the parents only looking to improve their lifestyle, and not concerned for the most part about the child. After all, most parents would do anything for a child even if it meant some inconvenience on their part. But for some reason I cannot get out of my mind the idea that they're looking out for themselves here, and in the best case were hoping for minimal damage on Ashley's part. Who am I compare them to is the following: When I was a child there was a Yid in our building, A B'non shel K'deyshim who had a child with MS r"l. This child was actually around 18-20 when I knew him, and he went to a state-run school for such children (UCP). They lived on the 3rd floor, and when the bus would drop him off after 4pm I would see this Yid, in his 50's with a weak heart, go down the stairs, lift his son out of the wheelchair, sling him over his shoulders (he was quite heavy) and shlep him up 3 flights of stairs to his apartment. This boy, needless to say, was not very helpful when he was being lifted up, and it was quite a shlep up the stairs.

Maybe it's the notion that life should be difficult that dictates my thoughts on the matter, or that the human body is not to be "toyed" with like that. I can't quite put my finger on it. But something Shmekt mir nit over here, and no matter how hard I try I cannot justify the total procedure done to this poor girl. Un Tommer vet ihr fregen Vos badert mir Azey vos pasirt mit a nit-Yidisher maidel? Keydem Kol efsher iz zi yeh a Yidisher, un afiloo Eyb nit iz zi doch a hilfloze kind, un m'darf af ihr Rachmones Hobben!

Green Chareidim?

This just in:

A new environmental group aims to enlist Haredim
(Matthew Wagner, THE JERUSALEM POST Jan. 7, 2007)

Global warming, the thinning ozone layer and the greenhouse effect
are not presently at the top of the haredi community's priority list, but
an organization known as Haredim Le'sviva (Haredim for the
Environment) wants to change that. Not only desecration of Shabbat by El Al or the sale of immodest clothing in Bnei Brak and Jerusalem will be at the forefront of haredi interests if Haredim Le'sviva has its way, but also educating against littering and encouraging recycling.

In the first conference of its kind, haredi MKs and a dozen local
government politicians together with Tel Aviv Chief Rabbi Meir Lau,
will meet Monday in Bnei Brak to discuss recycling, air and noise
pollution and the adverse effects of cellular phone antennas.Environment Minister Gideon Ezra will also attend the conference. McCann Erickson, an ad agency with a haredi department, will be sponsoring the gathering.

So far none of the major haredi halachic authorities has come out
publicly in support of the move and without their support it is doubtful
that Haredim Le'sviva's initiative will gain momentum. However, according to Yehudah Ganut, a young haredi educator from Petah Tikva who founded the organization several years ago, two prominent rabbis are backing his organization. Rabbi Yitzhak Zilberstein, an expert in medicine and halacha, and Rabbi Shmuel Eliezer Stern, a member of Rabbi Shmuel Halevi Vozner's rabbinic
court, both support increasing haredi awareness to environmental
issues.

Akiva Briland, a member of Haredim Le'sviva, told The Jerusalem
Post that there were many classical Jewish sources supporting
environmental protection. "For instance, Jewish law states that a tree must be planted 50 amot (25 meters) from the city out of consideration for the landscape and
the Midrash [homiletic rabbinic commentary] warns man to be careful
not to destroy the world," said Briland. Briland and Ganut say that haredim realize the importance of protecting the environment, but they have yet to be mobilized.

According to a survey conducted by Mutagim, a leading pollster, 94%
of haredim surveyed said that protecting the environment was
important. Some 72% said they were bothered by air pollution and the
same amount said they wanted to live in a green setting.

In a related development, the government set in motion Sunday a
recycling bill that would include as refundable 1.5 to 2 liter plastic
bottles. The government set up a committee that is supposed to
prepare the legislation within a month. The Sephardi haredi Shas party
has opposed the bill, arguing that it would hurt large families. Shas
said that including the bigger bottles as eligible for a deposit refund
would raise the price by half a shekel.

"We do not have enough refund outlets for the bottles," MK Amnon
Cohen (Shas). "So haredi families will pay the extra price without
getting their money back." Haredim Le'sviva recommended allowing non-profit organizations to collect the bottles, thus encouraging citizens to recycle them.
Briland said that in Bnei Brak last year, four million bottles were returned for refunds.

Read it at Jpost.com

Rashi remains our Rebbe for pshat

Commenting on the Yaakov Aveinu lo meis thread, Milhouse writes:

This is a wonderful explanation of the possuk, of why the chumosh doesn't say vayomos, as it does about every other death, except that of Dovid Hamelech. The Ramban says something similar, as do many other meforshim on the chumosh. But they do not have the burden of explaining the gemoro. They can explain the chumosh any way they like, but it's almost impossible to read the gemoro in a way consistent with these explanations.

The gemoro remarks that Yaakeiv Ovinu Lei Meis, and asks why, in that case, he was embalmed, mourned, and buried. Now it could have answered that even though his essence didn't die in the way that almost everybody else does, his body was still lifeless, and needed to be dealt with. RAYK's observation, that only the Egyptians mourned him, explains one of the gemoro's three questions, but doesn't address the other two. It was Yeiseif who ordered him embalmed, and it was his sons who buried him; and the gemoro assumes that if he were not dead then these things would not have been necessary. And it does not offer any explanation. Instead it insists that we must accept that it was so, despite the difficulty, because it's a drosho on a posuk in Yirmiyohu.

Now, the rationalists will of course explain that what the gemoro's saying is "it's only a medrosh, it's not real - In reality, Yaakeiv was as dead as a doornail, and was embalmed, mourned, and buried just like any other stiff; the absence of the word vayomos is to let us make nice droshos and learn all sorts of moral lessons, but we all know that it wasn't actually so." And they will laugh at all the credulous right-wingers who drink the Artscroll kool aid and take medroshim literally.

But Rashi will have none of that. Veho dechontu chontayo, sevurim hoyu shemeis. And he repeats himself a few lines later: Udechontu chontayo, nidmeh lohem shemeis, avol chai hoyo. Had they known the truth that Yaakeiv had not died, they would not have embalmed him. Nor, we may infer, would they have mourned or buried him. Clearly Rashi understands Yaakeiv Ovinu lei meis in a way that is inconsistent with embalming, mourning, and burial, and therefore cannot accept any of these nice explanations about his soul not tasting the level of death called misoh, or about his body never having been essential to who he was, etc.

Of course we're not obligated to accept Rashi's explanation; we are free to offer other explanations, both of the posuk and of the gemoro. And with what we now know about Egyptian embalming technology (which Rashi had no way of knowing), it seems obvious that even if Yaakeiv was alive when the embalmers started working on him, he cannot possibly have been so when they were finished. So we may respectfully disagree with this Rashi; but what we cannot do is ignore it and pretend it doesn't exist. Rashi remains our rebbe for pshat in gemoro, and this is what he says the gemoro means. And yet there is so much hostility to this view, especially in the last 12 years.

Million Word Site

The Brainchild of Circus Tent Commenter Itzhak Scheier

The Zhmigroder Rebbe zt"l

Oldest of the Sanzer Rov's great grandchildren passed away at 98. He was the son of Reb Sinai of Zhmigrod, the son of Reb Boruch Of Gorlitz, son of the Sanzer Rov, the Divrei Chaim zt"l.

Yaakov Ovinu Lo Meis

הרב ד'יפו on Parshas VaYechi

Highlights:

When a person dies, two things occur. First, the bodily functions (breathing, pumping of the heart, and so on) cease. This is called Geviyah (expiring). The second aspect of death concerns the soul. After the sin of Adam, the first man, death was decreed in order to allow the soul to purify itself from its contact with the body's physical drives and desires. Death purges the soul of those sensual influences that distance one from true closeness to God. The aspect of death that cleanses the soul is called מיתה.

In certain respects, Jacob did in fact die. But this was only in personal matters, due to the baseness of the physical world and its negative influence upon the human soul. Yet, that was not the true essence of Jacob's soul. When the Torah describes Jacob's passing, it does so in terms of his life's goal, as the father of the Jewish people. The Torah does not use the word 'death,' since these was no need to purge his soul of its ties to its worldly occupations.

This explains why we don't find in the Torah that Jacob's sons eulogized their father. Only the Egyptians did so — "A profound mourning for Egypt" [Gen. 50:11]. Jacob had assisted the Egyptians by bringing the years of famine to an early end. From the standpoint of the Egyptians, Jacob had died, and the connection of his soul to these matters was severed. Therefore, the Egyptians had reason to mourn. But Jacob's sons, who knew that Jacob was still alive with them, had no need to eulogize their father.

[adapted from Midbar Shur, pp. 242-251]

Click on the link for the complete text.

אויך מיר א מצוה

Rabbi Yaakov Stefansky of Jerusalem, founder and director of the
Kinyan Ha’aretz Association.

One of the local circulars, the Luach HaTzibur, which advertises such important things like where Yankel Bergstein is making a Kiddush this week, and the Great G&G Clothing sale, has begun to advertise a new Mitzvah, Mitzvos Hatluyos Bo'Oretz. They sell you a small (miniscule) plot of land and take care of all the Mitzvos that are required of you, some 20 in all. It also carries the standard "BeHaskomas Gedolei Yisroel Shlit"a" that everything else has these days. A smart man upon seeing this ad commented: it's like that ad you hear on the radio saying: "for 54 dollars and a call to ------- you can have a star named after you." Would this fall into the same category? maybe. Now I see in the Five Towns Jewish Times that there's a name attached to it, a Rabbi Yaakov Stefansky, I believe he's formerly of Dagim Tuna?

"Jewish people all over the world will now be able to fulfill all of the precious Mitzvos ha’teluyos ba’Aretz - laws dependent on the Land of Israel.
This opportunity has been made available as a result of the efforts of the
Kinyan Ha’aretz Association, recently founded by a group of prominent
Israeli Rabbanim. [Sounds a lot like the JNF, no? - HT]............. Throughout the bitter Galus, Jews have always longed to live in Eretz HaKedoshah, where all of the Torah’s mitzvos may be fulfilled. ...........

When preparing for his journey to Eretz Yisrael, the Chazon Ish’s primary concern wasn’t packing his belongings or arranging the practical aspects of his move, but clarifying certain points regarding the performance of the mitzvos ha’teluyos ba’aretz, which he would soon be able to fulfill. [No mention here that the person he asked was Rav Kook. - HT]

Now all that has changed, and these mitzvos, which many have never fulfilled, will be yours! What is involved? The Kinyan Ha’aretz Association has leased, for a period of fifty years, agricultural land near the towns of
Zichron Yaakov and Mazkeret Batya. On these plots it will operate a wheat field and a vineyard, where farmers will cultivate produce on behalf of its
members and, when harvesting time arrives, will fulfill all of the relevant
mitzvos ha’teluyos ba’aretz. At that time, each member will appoint
Kinyan Ha’aretz as his emissary to perform these mitzvos on his behalf, and
will be considered as having personally performed them. Anyone who wishes, no matter
where he lives, may lease “dalet amos” of this land for a nominal fee, and will
thus be able to fulfill all of the land-related laws on his very own piece of
property.

This idea has received the ardent support of Maran HaRav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, the halachic pillar of our generation, who said: “One who merits to be a partner in the important association,
and to thereby fulfill these beloved mitzvos, is indeed fortunate.”

............................ This is not a new idea. Its roots date back to the 18th century, when the disciples of the Vilna Gaon who settled in Tsfat founded an enterprise which would enable Jews of the Diaspora to fulfill these mitzvos. They were guided by Rav Chaim of Volozhin. (A letter which appeared in Pe’as HaShulchan of Rav Yisrael of Shklov testifies to this endeavor.) However, various difficulties prevented the plan from materializing, and technical and administrative problems prevented its realization.

Jews of the Diaspora are not obligated to keep mitzvos hateluyos ba’aretz, since they don’t live in Eretz Yisrael. However, as the Shelah HaKadosh notes, when a person undertakes to observe them nonetheless, Middas HaDin is transformed to Middas HaRachamim.During these troubled times, when
we so need Middas HaRachamim, let us do our utmost to help it prevail in
Klal Yisrael." [so is this a not-for-profit venture set up just to infuse the world with Midas HoRachamim?! - HT]

It used to be that people, especially Acheynu Yatzay Litteh, either worked or learned, they didn't sit around and look for a Chap, a Drei, how to help a Yid find a Mitzvah. I can understand starting organizations that fulfill a need, even a G'mach for Untervesh, but this seems a bit much. Then again, maybe it's the fact that I'm not part of mainstream Judaism anymore that makes me think this way. I should begin to read the Yated every week, maybe that'll help change me for the better. You be the judge.

It's all about Convenience

You may have read about nine-year old Ashley X, whose parents "froze her in time" at age 6 three years ago, and now have their blog where they discuss their decision. They took this poor invalid girl apart like some broken down car that you sell for spare parts, all so she shouldn't be a burden later in life. They sat and devised this plan with doctors, and had the hospital board vote whether or not to do this procedure. They kept it all a big secret until now, when they began to blog about it.

Here's what they did: From the British Guardian: "Ashley Treatment" - a course of surgery and hormone supplements devised for her at her parents' request and with the blessing of doctors - that will for ever keep her small. It involves surgical operations, including a hysterectomy, and hormone prescriptions that will, in effect, freeze-frame her body at its current size." For good measure they added the fact that they were concerned that men would take advantage of her later in life if she would grow to be full size to the reason that they decided to go ahead with this. How noble of them. These two professionals are seemingly too busy with their respective careers to be bothered with a child, which I can understand, but why bother at all?

M'Zol nit visen fun azelche Tzores, but this seems too much for me to understand, although I have b"h no idea what it's like to deal with a child like this. Is the need to have a child so great? This child has been this way since birth, and if she's such a burden why not give her to a family where she can at least be loved for who she is, and not just for how easy she is to care for. I cannot believe that parents who love a child so much that they can't bear to part with her and give her away to be cared for, can do this to a child. It must be somewhat painful for the child too although she has no way of expressing herself.

If I needed to guess, and based on an admittedly stereotypical assumption about them, I would say that these two are G-dless people. By that I mean that they have no religious sense of what's right and wrong, and decide fore themselves based solely on what popular opinion is, or even if it's not populr yet. They see this world not as a place that serves their wants and needs, not as a place to accomplish a mission. Whatever it takes for the woman to achieve that "supermom" image, even if it means to have a perpetual baby girl. That's not to say that the dad is not to blame for this too. The fact that this child is now referred to as a "pillow angel" leads me to believe that thay have a very warped sense of priorities.I've used common sense only in discussing this, no Torah authorities were consulted. I doubt there would be a universal Halachic answer to it anyway.

Hashem Yishmoreinu, af alle Son'im gezogt.

Omit One, or Two, or More

Gil Student in Hihurim writes that he's surprised that The Frankel Rambam people won't admit that they practice PCism when bringing sources. He brings a list of many "religious Zionists" like Reb Mendel Kasher, Rav Kook, Rav Teichtel and others who wrote extensively on the Rambam yet failed to make it. One of the "victims" of this practice is of course, The Rebbe.. Why am I not surprised?

A commenter there writes that he once met Reb Shabse in a Shtibel in Yerushalayim and asked him why he doesn't bring Rav Kook. Frenkel's answer was I do what's right for the business of selling Seforim, if I put in a source that's somewhat controversial to some learners they won't buy my sefer. "Rav Kook doesn't need my "Haskomoh!" Meaning that his greatness is not determined by whether or not he quotes him.

I AM surprised, however, even though I could maybe understand his decision, because of the relationship that Shabse Frenkel had with the Rebbe. Many, many letters and private audiences with the Rebbe had Shabse. So, it's tough to do that to a person ou know and respect. I would imagine that the Rebbe told him not to quote him if it would hurt his Parnossoh. This is the world we live in, the Almoh DeShikrah.

Chazan Shepsil Kanarek

Why 35 years later?

(From Berl Levin's Kuntres Didan Notzach)

Over Shabbos much of the discussion outside of יחודא עילאה and יחודא תתאה was about the events of Hey Teves והמסתעף. One of the points discussed was why the Eynikel waited 35 to claim what was "rightfully his inheritance." I see from the Kuntres that there was an attempt to divide up the library in 5710, but the rebbe would not have it. The Library was kept in the basement of 770, under the auspices of Chaim Liberman. In 5740 CL asked Berl Levin to run the library for him since he was getting old and had no Koach for it. The Rebbe would not allow it, satying that it would turn into Politics. Many theories about the insurgence of 5745 were thrown around the room last Shabbos, including the theory that the Eynikel had a gambling problem, or he needed money to treat his bad back. The best one all, and the one closest to the truth is the following:

After the events of The summer of 5743, when the attempt on Reb Mendel Vechter's life failed but left him a broken man, Satmar was terribly embarrassed. Although they openly defended what they did, saying that he's at fault for "Chappen Kinder," and many agreed with them, still most people were of the opinion that they went too far. One of the ways to "get back" at Chabad and the Rebbe was to embarrass them too. The idea was hatched by certain elements in Satmar, namely Fogel/Cohen, and the conduit to this great plan would be the Eynikel. It may not have been the Eynikel himself but rather the Eynikel's wife, "Reb Mina." They came to him and her and told them that they'd been robbed of their rightful inheritance by their uncle, and it was time to get it back. Of course it didn't happen overnight, and it needed some nudging and prodding, but the plan worked. They convinced the Eynikel to take what was "rightfully his," and to go to court if he's stopped. The rest is history.

Is it that far fetched that haters, real haters, not some two-timing amateur snag, would sit and hatch plans to bring down who they preceive to be their biggest enemy? Is it a stretch to think that people who are Shayech to murder would pull a shtick like that? I don't think so. The idea actually came from one of Cohen's victims, a Yungerman with not an ounce of hate in his heart for any Jew, besides for Cohen that is. What do you think?

More on Di Bukovina

Reader MIB writes:


Reb Mendel of Seret flanked to our right by his son Reb Moshe Yosef of Cimpulung and to our left by his son in law Reb Sholom Lamm of Secureni.

I'd like to share some very interesting (and forgotten) history on a Rebbishe family in "di Bukovina":

A little history:

One of the most prominent Rebbes pre WWI Bukovina was R’ Shmuel Schmelke Rubin of Seret (1840-1901), founder of the original Seret Chassidic dynasty and son in law of R’ Yosef Alter Hager of Radovitz (son of R’ Chaim of Kosov).

R’ Schmelke was the eldest grandson of the Sar Sholom of Belz and was raised in the house of his Zeide. From his father’s side he was ben achar ben of R’ Usher of Ropschitz. R’ Schmelke’s younger brother is bakant in Belz as R’ Meliech Yabrover.
As an Eidim by Kosov, R’ Schmelke adopted many of the Minhogei Kosov and davened in the special Kosover Nusach. R’ Schmelke’s influence was profound throughout Bukovina, his Chassidim established many “kloyzen” in cities such as Radovitz (Radauti), Shotz (Suceava) and Gura Homorului. Stories of his mofsim were widespread and it was said that his maternal Zeide the Sar tought him Chochmas HaRefuah. R’ Schmelke passed away in 1901 and is buried in the Sereter Beis Olam where until today the original stands untouched.

R’ Schmelke’s children and grandchildren were very prominent throughout Bukovina and the surrounding areas. R’ Schmelke had many famous sons in law including:

R’ Eleizer Brandwein, the famed Burshteiner Rebbe
R’ Alter Yissacher Ber, the Alshtat-Komarna Rebbe
R’ Chaim Dachner, Av Beis Din in Seret (maternal grandfather of the Muzhai, Sulitz and Sasregener Rebbeim)

R’ Schmelke’s son R’ Mendele Rubin (1871-1941) succeeded him as Rebbe in Seret. His Rebisteve was considerably smaller than his father’s as he was very young when he took over, but he nonetheless maintained a respectable hoif in Seret. Then came WWI, All the Jews of Seret left, and when those who returned found a town utterly destroyed by the war. R’ Mendele was among the returnees and in time rebuilt his hoif. But as you mentioned on your site, Bukovina was a very different place post WWI and the new generation was far less Chassidic than their father’s had been. While some of Buklvina’s more prominent Rebbes dealt with this by leaving Bukovina, R’ Mendel of Seret stayed put. His children however were very aware of the changes around them, but rather than leave Bukovina most of them stayed and tried to strengthen Yidishkeit from within.

R’ Mendel’s sons were:

R’ Moshe Yosef Rubin, Rav of Cimpulung-Moldevenesc (later head of the Vaad Hatzalah in Bucharest)
R’ Chaim Yitzchok Rubin, Rav of S’chilka (Strylki) next to Sambor (renowned in Belzer circles as the Schilker Ruv)
R’ Avrohom Usher Rubin, Rav of Kotzman in Bukovina.

R’ Mendel’s sons in law were:
R’ Meshulam Rath, Rav of Shotz and later of Chernovitz
R’ Sholom Lamm, Rav of Secureni in Bessarabia.

The above-mentioned Rabbonim did much in their respective communities (which rank among the largest in the region) and it was thanks to them that Yiddishkeit did maintain at least some standard in these Kehilos. In 1936, Reb Mendel’s cousin R’ Bourch, son of the Ahavas Yisroel was elected Rav of Seret. He was extremely popular among the town’s inhabitants. R’ Boruch came to Eretz Yisrael after WWII and founded Ramat Vizhnitz in Haifa. In order to differentiate from his older brother the Chassidim refer to him and his sons as the Seret-Vizhnitzer Rebbe.

Today, among the many eineklach of the original Seret dynasty the only DYNASTIES that remainbed are the Muzhai, Sulitz and Sasregen.

Ipods sure waste your time

I went and bought an 80GB Ipod at Costco yesterday. The price was actually 10 dollars more than what B&H charges, but the return policy at Costco is what made me get there. I got home and started to install it. The machine needs the latest version of ITunes, 7.0.2 in this case, and can be downloaded from Apple.com. I downloaded the ITunes Installer and proceeded to run the application. There was the first problem. After the ITunes application downloaded I got a message that Windows Installer was no good and thus would not install the ITunes program. So I sit there with this new machine not being able to use it. I went to another computer that had very little of the content I wanted to upload and there it worked just fine. So, at least I got it to work a bit. I then went back to the original computer and finally did what any clueless computer technician worth his salt would do: I googled the error message and found the solution. I then finished installing ITunes and started to add folders from My computer into the ITunes folder.

The machine still doesn't run Vi Es Darf Tzu Zein. I get an error (-50) message that the IPod could not sync photo folders that I added. Also, the folder "Heichel Haneginah," the Tshureh from Heichel Menachem this year 19 Kislev, loaded onto the Ipod but "Cannot be found" on ITunes. So if I want to play the tunes from the computer I can't. It also takes forever to copy CD's onto ITunes, RealPlayer, I noticed, does a much quicker job at copying to My Library. Spending Hours loading this little Tcachke is not what I had in mind when I bought it, but I guess it goes with the territory. Der Ikker is that no longer must I be able to hold a Sefer on those long commutes to work, something not always possible. I can now just stick those little IBuds in my ears and listen. Time flies when you're in DVeykus Land.

Why the Rebbes left di Bukovina

Synagogue of the Sadagora Rebbe, about 1910

It sure doesn't look like a Rebbishe Hoif to me, more like a Parisian Boulevard actually. The bowler hat and yie on the gentleman in the foreground, and the umbrella etc. on the lady in the background. This was still 1910, imagine 20 years later! The Rizhiner kinder also left for the most part, with the Stefanester the exception to the rule, leaving to Vienna at WWI, never to return. Seems like the Vizhnitzer cousin conferred with them, or vice versa.


Opening parade at the Maccabee Games in Chernivtsi (1927)


Chernovitz is no surprise though.