First we were told that
Toras HaBaal Shem Tov was forgotten. Not the
derech, they said, just the
Torah. So what we have now in our Chassidic world is - I'm supposed to believe -
derech HaBaal Shem Tov. But why then was the
davka the
Torah forgotten? Why is it different than
Toras HaMussar - or
Torah in general that never was and never will be forgotten? Was only
Chassidus Chabad forgotten, since it's too deep for our shallow heads? Now we're being told that there really was never TRUE opposition to
Chassidus after all! Yes, the
Gro may have opposed the
davening late, or maybe all the drinking and dancing, but that was probably because of the
Bittul Zman and
Bittul Torah. And besides, we're against that too, so that's no
chiddush. But there was no "
Ches," despite the documents we've seen and all the history written about it. If you tell me that ווייסהויז made this stuff up then I guess we can go back to the drawing board... Also, I hear that the new book "The
Rebbe" about the
Satmar Rov has some cute attacks against the new
Yeshivishe derech haLimud, (such as saying that it's very often "
boych s'vores," and that's why they're so "into it.") which is interesting, since the book will be read primarily by those who subscribe to that
derech...

then I received this via email: (with minimal additions by yours truly)"The
Belzer Rebbe and his mouth piece are on a full fledged war against
Mevakshim that are not satisfied in
Belz. As usual they're saying that it's a disease in many
chassidesen that people look elsewhere. It's shocking the way things that used to be unofficial talk (and were discussed in private - "
pnimi") are now officially discussed in the
Zietungen. The "H
amevaser" covers this new jive with pages upon pages of coverage.
Pinchas Friedman - the unofficial spokesman for the
Belzer Rov - spoke about it at the jubilee of the
hatzola of the
Belzer Rov zt"l and his brother the
Bilgorajer Rov (9 Shvat.) The
Belzer Ruv first gave the pep talk with his childish observations with very little
Torah, he creates a
"kedushas Belz" that is hot air, He says things like "the
Yoshvim were
mafkir themselves, their families, and gave away their
nefesh for
Belz." What kind of a lie is that? They gave away their life for
torah and
kedusha that they believed they found in
Belz, they were
chasidim of the
Belzer Rebbe that they believed is the
Tzadik Hador, but this lie of the name "
Belz!" it's all brainwashing the people so that they stick around with him and his son, a certified "nobody in all fields." He finished it off saying that we have to
chazer that again and again; the whole year, we have strive and work for that, and ask
Hashem for
Kedushas Belz. He claims that the
Belzer Derech is not a lot of going to the
Mikvah, no
Tehilim, no Fasting.
Pinchas Friedman claims as follows: after the
Belzer kingdom was rebuilt after the war, the
Yetzer Hora does not stop, he's not happy seeing that the great
Belz has been rebuilt. He tries to confuse the people with thoughts that you are not respected enough in your current place, and all kind of thoughts and
Nisyones about where he currently is, so that he thinks about other places. This is all so that the
Yetzer Horah can destroy
Belz. All that is
atzas haYetzer,
Friedman says. The
Baal shem tov came on this world that people should be affiliated with a
Kehila and a
Chotzer. From my experience - he says - in education, I can say that I personally know people that left their
Kehillos for other places and got confused, it is not only when the leave
Belz it is also in other places too. It's interesting to note that
Pinchas Friedman learned in
Krasne Boro Park and left that structure to a new place called
Belz, but he can't see other people leaving where they grew up to go elsewhere. Also how come all these 100's of
Pupener Talmidim left
Pupa for
Belz; is this only a 1 way street? Are you only allowed to leave
to Belz, but not
FROM? why can't
Kluger create a
chabura and a
kehila?Sorry for my long rant, but I can not take this big farce that
Belz has become."
See the Friedman interview Here